Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial


Here are the Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial journals presenting the latest research across various disciplines. From social sciences to technology, each article is expected to provide valuable insights to our readers.

Blood pressure lowering rate, effects of having blood drawn, increased heart rate and low blood pressure, changes results in increased blood pressure, decrease of blood pressure, what does blood pressure effect, what affects lower number of blood pressure.

Effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment and intensive glucose control on dementia and cognitive decline according to baseline cognitive function and other subpopulations of individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results from the ADVANCE trial

Background and aims: Accumulating evidence indicates that reducing high blood pressure (BP) prevents dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Furthermore, although diabetes is a risk factor for dementia and MCI, there is uncertainty of the effect of intensive glucose control on these endpoints. This study aimed to determine the effects of BP-lowering (vs placebo) and intensive glucose-lowering (vs standard control) treatments according to baseline cognition and other characteristics on dementia and cognitive decline (CD) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) trial involved 11,140 individuals with T2DM. The effects of BP-lowering and intensive glucose-lowering treatments were explored in subgroups of baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), categorised as cognitively normal (scores ≥28) and cognitive impair ment (scores <28). The primary outcome was a composite of dementia/CD that accounted for the competing risk of death. Multinomial regression models, adjusted for common cardiovascular risk factors, were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of the effects of the treatments on dementia/CD. Homogeneity of effects by subgroups were evaluated using interaction terms in the models. A two-sided p value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results: BP-lowering treatment (vs. placebo) was associated with a lower odds of dementia/CD in participants with cognitive impairment (OR 0.76, 95 % CI (0.59–0.99)) but not in those cognitively normal (OR 1.05, 95 % CI (0.92–1.21); p for interaction 0.03). Those with a history of cardio-renal-metabolic syndrome did not experience a benefit of active BP lowering treatment compared with placebo on dementia/CD. There were no further subgroup effects of BP-lowering treatment. The effect of intensive glucose lowering (vs standard control) on the odds of dementia/CD did not vary by baseline cognition subgroup. However, it did vary by level of blood glucose at baseline (<7.9 mmol/L OR 1.12, 95 % CI (0.96–1.30) vs ≥ 7.9 mmol/L 0.87 (0.75–1.00); p for interaction 0.02) and duration of T2DM (<10 years OR 0.92 (0.81–1.05) vs ≥10 years 1.16 (0.97–1.38); p for interaction 0.04). Conclusions: This study suggests greater effects of BP-lowering treatment in those with early loss of cognitive function than in those cognitively normal. There were also differential effects of intensive glucose-lowering on dementia and CD according to levels of blood glucose and duration of diabetes in people with T2DM. Clinical trial registration: ADVANCE is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: number NCT00145925 © 2024 The Authors

Authors : Harris K.; Gong J.; MacMahon S.; Xu Y.; Shajahan S.; Harrap S.; Poulter N.; Marre M.; Hamet P.; Mancia G.; Anderson C.; Woodward M.; Chalmers J.

Source : Elsevier B.V.

Article Information

Year 2025
Type Article
DOI 10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100372
ISSN 26662450
Volume 8

You can download the article here


If You have any problem, contact us here


Support Us:

Download Now Buy me a coffee Request Paper Here